Comments on: Second Life in a browser on the near horizon /2010/10/28/second-life-in-a-browser-on-the-near-horizon/ Coverage of news, issues and events occurring in virtual worlds or those who create those worlds Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:44:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Lawra Idlemind /2010/10/28/second-life-in-a-browser-on-the-near-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-208027 Lawra Idlemind Mon, 01 Nov 2010 04:36:00 +0000 /?p=2879#comment-208027 If that can help me get online from behind the firewall at work, I may not leave SL after all. AjaxLife used to be my lifeline until linden Labs killed that possibility - all I need is a PC-based chat interface. I can live without graphics for a couple of weeks at a time; but no contact at all makes my SL too expensive for what I get out of it. If that can help me get online from behind the firewall at work, I may not leave SL after all.

AjaxLife used to be my lifeline until linden Labs killed that possibility – all I need is a PC-based chat interface. I can live without graphics for a couple of weeks at a time; but no contact at all makes my SL too expensive for what I get out of it.

]]>
By: Dael Ra /2010/10/28/second-life-in-a-browser-on-the-near-horizon/comment-page-1/#comment-208025 Dael Ra Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:46:00 +0000 /?p=2879#comment-208025 Why is it so important for SL to be in a browser? I don't see it. It's like trying to cram a round peg into a square hole. It's already an effort for a standalone viewer to run in the environment so what chance does a browser based version have? For it to even vaguely work, the browser based version will be highly restricted in its capabilities. There have been so many attempts at doing a browser based virtual world by so many companies and almost without fail they've all failed. I wish LL would stop going after the general populace and simply concentrate on the creative community instead. SL never was suitable for everyone. Most of the world either don't get it or don't see the point so why keep watering the environment down more and more in a vain effort to persuade them. Make the place wonderful to creators, give them all the tools they need, keep them happy and help them produce awe inspiring content and others will follow. Why is it so important for SL to be in a browser?

I don’t see it. It’s like trying to cram a round peg into a square hole. It’s already an effort for a standalone viewer to run in the environment so what chance does a browser based version have? For it to even vaguely work, the browser based version will be highly restricted in its capabilities.

There have been so many attempts at doing a browser based virtual world by so many companies and almost without fail they’ve all failed.

I wish LL would stop going after the general populace and simply concentrate on the creative community instead. SL never was suitable for everyone. Most of the world either don’t get it or don’t see the point so why keep watering the environment down more and more in a vain effort to persuade them.

Make the place wonderful to creators, give them all the tools they need, keep them happy and help them produce awe inspiring content and others will follow.

]]>