<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linden Lab blabs about the blog.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metaversejournal.com/2008/08/29/linden-lab-blabs-about-the-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2008/08/29/linden-lab-blabs-about-the-blog/</link>
	<description>Coverage of news, issues and events occurring in virtual worlds or those who create those worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:03:25 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dusan Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2008/08/29/linden-lab-blabs-about-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-206866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusan Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaversejournal.com/?p=1564#comment-206866</guid>
		<description>They want to be a platform and not a world. But they&#039;ve got this darn world on their hands, and having &#039;worldly communications&#039; with it, within it - well, it&#039;s not very platformy is it? Shifting anything smacking of community off into a separate part of the Web site, and then attaching &quot;experts&quot; to different topic areas, speaks to their internal dialogue which excludes community relations and includes words like &quot;user case&quot; and how to partition off the service functions into technology platforms that can later be white labeled for corporate consumption.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of which is fine but as always you get the sense that they have a poorly implemented road map for getting there. You shouldn&#039;t need to announce something like this 2 months before it happens unless there&#039;s something else hidden behind the curtain - a major launch? A buy-out? Merger? Or just the usual attempt by Robin Linden to fight fires but leaving us all sprayed with flame retardant foam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want to be a platform and not a world. But they&#39;ve got this darn world on their hands, and having &#39;worldly communications&#39; with it, within it &#8211; well, it&#39;s not very platformy is it? Shifting anything smacking of community off into a separate part of the Web site, and then attaching &#8220;experts&#8221; to different topic areas, speaks to their internal dialogue which excludes community relations and includes words like &#8220;user case&#8221; and how to partition off the service functions into technology platforms that can later be white labeled for corporate consumption.</p>
<p>All of which is fine but as always you get the sense that they have a poorly implemented road map for getting there. You shouldn&#39;t need to announce something like this 2 months before it happens unless there&#39;s something else hidden behind the curtain &#8211; a major launch? A buy-out? Merger? Or just the usual attempt by Robin Linden to fight fires but leaving us all sprayed with flame retardant foam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusan Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2008/08/29/linden-lab-blabs-about-the-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-141414</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusan Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaversejournal.com/?p=1564#comment-141414</guid>
		<description>They want to be a platform and not a world. But they&#039;ve got this darn world on their hands, and having &#039;worldly communications&#039; with it, within it - well, it&#039;s not very platformy is it? Shifting anything smacking of community off into a separate part of the Web site, and then attaching &quot;experts&quot; to different topic areas, speaks to their internal dialogue which excludes community relations and includes words like &quot;user case&quot; and how to partition off the service functions into technology platforms that can later be white labeled for corporate consumption.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All of which is fine but as always you get the sense that they have a poorly implemented road map for getting there. You shouldn&#039;t need to announce something like this 2 months before it happens unless there&#039;s something else hidden behind the curtain - a major launch? A buy-out? Merger? Or just the usual attempt by Robin Linden to fight fires but leaving us all sprayed with flame retardant foam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want to be a platform and not a world. But they&#39;ve got this darn world on their hands, and having &#39;worldly communications&#39; with it, within it &#8211; well, it&#39;s not very platformy is it? Shifting anything smacking of community off into a separate part of the Web site, and then attaching &#8220;experts&#8221; to different topic areas, speaks to their internal dialogue which excludes community relations and includes words like &#8220;user case&#8221; and how to partition off the service functions into technology platforms that can later be white labeled for corporate consumption.</p>
<p>All of which is fine but as always you get the sense that they have a poorly implemented road map for getting there. You shouldn&#39;t need to announce something like this 2 months before it happens unless there&#39;s something else hidden behind the curtain &#8211; a major launch? A buy-out? Merger? Or just the usual attempt by Robin Linden to fight fires but leaving us all sprayed with flame retardant foam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
