Comments on: Aussie population update for May – 10K here we come /2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/ Coverage of news, issues and events occurring in virtual worlds or those who create those worlds Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:44:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Aussie population update - stable at 10K /2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/comment-page-1/#comment-9215 Aussie population update - stable at 10K Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:12:33 +0000 http://www.sloz.info/2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/#comment-9215 [...] the measures have changed since last monthit’s difficult to provide a trend. Australia has maintained it’s ranking at 11th in the [...] [...] the measures have changed since last monthit’s difficult to provide a trend. Australia has maintained it’s ranking at 11th in the [...]

]]> By: Lowell /2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/comment-page-1/#comment-135157 Lowell Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:10 +0000 http://www.sloz.info/2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/#comment-135157 Hi Lee, thanks for your comment. The 10K is certainly an estimate and even defining 'active' is difficult. That said, from daily exposure to the SL community there certainly doesn't appear to be even 10K 'regulars' - but again, defining that is the challenge. Hi Lee, thanks for your comment. The 10K is certainly an estimate and even defining ‘active’ is difficult. That said, from daily exposure to the SL community there certainly doesn’t appear to be even 10K ‘regulars’ – but again, defining that is the challenge.

]]> By: Lowell /2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/comment-page-1/#comment-5494 Lowell Fri, 11 May 2007 07:50:10 +0000 http://www.sloz.info/2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/#comment-5494 Hi Lee, thanks for your comment. The 10K is certainly an estimate and even defining 'active' is difficult. That said, from daily exposure to the SL community there certainly doesn't appear to be even 10K 'regulars' - but again, defining that is the challenge. Hi Lee, thanks for your comment. The 10K is certainly an estimate and even defining ‘active’ is difficult. That said, from daily exposure to the SL community there certainly doesn’t appear to be even 10K ‘regulars’ – but again, defining that is the challenge.

]]> By: Lee Hopkins /2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/comment-page-1/#comment-135156 Lee Hopkins Fri, 11 May 2007 06:21:03 +0000 http://www.sloz.info/2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/#comment-135156 Hi,<br><br>Not sure I agree with the nearly 10k - I put it at much higher than that. There are 3.1m active participants, of which we are (using April's stats, not May's) 2.43% = 75,000. Okay, so 10% of them is 7.5k, but I would think that the 'active' number is higher than 10%, seeing as how much emotional and physical energy one invests in being a part of the 3.1m active participants.<br><br>Lee Hi,

Not sure I agree with the nearly 10k – I put it at much higher than that. There are 3.1m active participants, of which we are (using April’s stats, not May’s) 2.43% = 75,000. Okay, so 10% of them is 7.5k, but I would think that the ‘active’ number is higher than 10%, seeing as how much emotional and physical energy one invests in being a part of the 3.1m active participants.

Lee

]]> By: Lee Hopkins /2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/comment-page-1/#comment-5490 Lee Hopkins Fri, 11 May 2007 05:21:03 +0000 http://www.sloz.info/2007/05/11/aussie-population-update-for-may-10k-here-we-come/#comment-5490 Hi, Not sure I agree with the nearly 10k - I put it at much higher than that. There are 3.1m active participants, of which we are (using April's stats, not May's) 2.43% = 75,000. Okay, so 10% of them is 7.5k, but I would think that the 'active' number is higher than 10%, seeing as how much emotional and physical energy one invests in being a part of the 3.1m active participants. Lee Hi,

Not sure I agree with the nearly 10k – I put it at much higher than that. There are 3.1m active participants, of which we are (using April’s stats, not May’s) 2.43% = 75,000. Okay, so 10% of them is 7.5k, but I would think that the ‘active’ number is higher than 10%, seeing as how much emotional and physical energy one invests in being a part of the 3.1m active participants.

Lee

]]>