Comments on: Child Pornography – Linden Lab’s firm response

By: Wolfie Rankin

Wolfie Rankin — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:54:15 +0000

I don't think that people wanting child avatars is a bad thing, as Violetta said, it could be very cathartic for those who missed their childhood... I had a good one I think, but
I still miss it at times.

A friend of mine once told me that all Women on SL are Men and all Child avatars are the FBI, that was pretty cheeky, and I'm sure it's wrong but I had to write it.

Furries do cop a bit of flack now and then, but only from people who think it's just a weird fetish... Like Violetta, I'm not a furry because of the sexual stuff, it just suits me.

I think it's a shame that I can't bring my grand neice into SL with me, She's seen it and loves it.

I would love to see something setup where kids are allowed on the main grid,
provided they can only get on g-rated islands, can only log in with a parent or guardian and cannot teleport to another island without their guardian.

SL has done a lot to bring friends together, but families have been a bit left out.

Wolfie!

By: Violetta

Violetta — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:29:16 +0000

In Second Life I live it as a child. This has nothing to do with sexual stuff. I just live life as a child, get a family and act like a child. For some of my fellow Second Lifers, its a chance to relive your childhood, if you’ve had a bad one. You’re cared for and highly protected.

What’s to say it’s child porn?

By: Virtual Worlds and Australia 2007 Part 1 : The Metaverse Journal - Australia’s Virtual World News Service

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:43:28 +0000

[...] we published a story on Linden Lab’s crackdown on ageplay in Second Life. This has been our most viewed story ever and still receives enormous [...]

By: Naoki Ninetails

Naoki Ninetails — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:07:35 +0000

Just seeing this post quite late…. I refuse to comment on “Tim G.”’s post because it was frankly ignorant.

However, I would like to explain that EGL – Elegant Gothic Lolita – is a fashion movement from Japan that is anything but sexual. It’s no more sexual than the babydoll dress craze of the 90s. Weird, but *not* sexual. It’s just a fashion thing, clothing inspired by Victorian and doll-like styles of dress. There’s a male version too. The “Lolita” part is just the English name that Japanese trendsetters chose. It doesn’t serve the purpose of making the wearer appear as an actual child.

By: Naoki Ninetails

Naoki Ninetails — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:07:35 +0000

Just seeing this post quite late…. I refuse to comment on “Tim G.”’s post because it was frankly ignorant.

By: Tim G.

Tim G. — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:49:09 +0000

Who really cairs? There just cartoons of girls that may or may not be underage. The key word here is “Cartoons” as in not real.

I know, I know in some parts of the world even that is illegal but I just don’t get make a law that makes it illegal.

By: Tim G.

Tim G. — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:49:09 +0000

Who really cairs? There just cartoons of girls that may or may not be underage. The key word here is “Cartoons” as in not real.

I know, I know in some parts of the world even that is illegal but I just don’t get make a law that makes it illegal.