<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teens protesting &#8211; unification with main grid an option?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metaversejournal.com/2007/04/17/teens-protesting-unification-with-main-grid-an-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2007/04/17/teens-protesting-unification-with-main-grid-an-option/</link>
	<description>Coverage of news, issues and events occurring in virtual worlds or those who create those worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Harbinger</title>
		<link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2007/04/17/teens-protesting-unification-with-main-grid-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-135751</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Harbinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sloz.info/2007/04/17/teens-protesting-unification-with-main-grid-an-option/#comment-135751</guid>
		<description>As an active member of the Teen Grid, and a full supporter of the Unification, I believe this is within Second Life&#039;s grasp.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem of grooming has been brought up countless many times since the idea was first proposed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s an excerpt from an E-mail:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;As a small, yet fun test, I created a &#039;PG and Profanity&#039; filter for local&lt;br&gt;chat. The filter would pick up certain words when they were said, such as&lt;br&gt;profane words, or sexually explicit words. Within just a few days, my&lt;br&gt;filter had picked up hundreds of violations, and with each, spewed out a&lt;br&gt;simple &#039;Don&#039;t use profanity&#039; or &#039;You are in a PG-sim. Don&#039;t use sexually&lt;br&gt;explicit themes&#039;, et cetera.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point being that the Teen Grid is far from &#039;dandy&#039;. In fact, I believe&lt;br&gt;Teens are at a much higher risk on the Teen Grid then if the teens were&lt;br&gt;able to venture to the Main Grid.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An adult, a pedophile - for the sake of arguments, lets make this person a&lt;br&gt;male. This adult decides he wants to &#039;attack some teens&#039;, so he makes a&lt;br&gt;Teen Grid account. Fact - Teens are more likely to have open contact with&lt;br&gt;their peers. The adult would be most quickly accepted as &#039;part of the&lt;br&gt;group&#039; under a Teen alias then had the adult tried to same thing on the&lt;br&gt;Main Grid if teens were present there. The teens would most likely&lt;br&gt;instantly report a &#039;freaky old guy hitting on&#039; them then &#039;a possibly cute&lt;br&gt;boy from So-Cal&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While it may seem Teens will be at a higher risk on the Main Grid, it is&lt;br&gt;in fact the opposite. Teens don&#039;t have any walls up, they&#039;re vulnerable on&lt;br&gt;the Teen Grid; Teens are still at a stage where they may trust their peers&lt;br&gt;pretty easily.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Alex Harbinger&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[http://www.alexharbinger.com for the full Proposal]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an active member of the Teen Grid, and a full supporter of the Unification, I believe this is within Second Life&#8217;s grasp.</p>
<p>The problem of grooming has been brought up countless many times since the idea was first proposed.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from an E-mail:</p>
<p>&#8220;As a small, yet fun test, I created a &#8216;PG and Profanity&#8217; filter for local<br />chat. The filter would pick up certain words when they were said, such as<br />profane words, or sexually explicit words. Within just a few days, my<br />filter had picked up hundreds of violations, and with each, spewed out a<br />simple &#8216;Don&#8217;t use profanity&#8217; or &#8216;You are in a PG-sim. Don&#8217;t use sexually<br />explicit themes&#8217;, et cetera.</p>
<p>My point being that the Teen Grid is far from &#8216;dandy&#8217;. In fact, I believe<br />Teens are at a much higher risk on the Teen Grid then if the teens were<br />able to venture to the Main Grid.</p>
<p>An adult, a pedophile &#8211; for the sake of arguments, lets make this person a<br />male. This adult decides he wants to &#8216;attack some teens&#8217;, so he makes a<br />Teen Grid account. Fact &#8211; Teens are more likely to have open contact with<br />their peers. The adult would be most quickly accepted as &#8216;part of the<br />group&#8217; under a Teen alias then had the adult tried to same thing on the<br />Main Grid if teens were present there. The teens would most likely<br />instantly report a &#8216;freaky old guy hitting on&#8217; them then &#8216;a possibly cute<br />boy from So-Cal&#8217;.</p>
<p>While it may seem Teens will be at a higher risk on the Main Grid, it is<br />in fact the opposite. Teens don&#8217;t have any walls up, they&#8217;re vulnerable on<br />the Teen Grid; Teens are still at a stage where they may trust their peers<br />pretty easily.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />Alex Harbinger</p>
<p>[http://www.alexharbinger.com for the full Proposal]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Harbinger</title>
		<link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2007/04/17/teens-protesting-unification-with-main-grid-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Harbinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sloz.info/2007/04/17/teens-protesting-unification-with-main-grid-an-option/#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>As an active member of the Teen Grid, and a full supporter of the Unification, I believe this is within Second Life&#039;s grasp.

The problem of grooming has been brought up countless many times since the idea was first proposed.

Here&#039;s an excerpt from an E-mail:

&quot;As a small, yet fun test, I created a &#039;PG and Profanity&#039; filter for local
chat. The filter would pick up certain words when they were said, such as
profane words, or sexually explicit words. Within just a few days, my
filter had picked up hundreds of violations, and with each, spewed out a
simple &#039;Don&#039;t use profanity&#039; or &#039;You are in a PG-sim. Don&#039;t use sexually
explicit themes&#039;, et cetera.

My point being that the Teen Grid is far from &#039;dandy&#039;. In fact, I believe
Teens are at a much higher risk on the Teen Grid then if the teens were
able to venture to the Main Grid.

An adult, a pedophile - for the sake of arguments, lets make this person a
male. This adult decides he wants to &#039;attack some teens&#039;, so he makes a
Teen Grid account. Fact - Teens are more likely to have open contact with
their peers. The adult would be most quickly accepted as &#039;part of the
group&#039; under a Teen alias then had the adult tried to same thing on the
Main Grid if teens were present there. The teens would most likely
instantly report a &#039;freaky old guy hitting on&#039; them then &#039;a possibly cute
boy from So-Cal&#039;.

While it may seem Teens will be at a higher risk on the Main Grid, it is
in fact the opposite. Teens don&#039;t have any walls up, they&#039;re vulnerable on
the Teen Grid; Teens are still at a stage where they may trust their peers
pretty easily.&quot;

Thanks,
Alex Harbinger

[http://www.alexharbinger.com for the full Proposal]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an active member of the Teen Grid, and a full supporter of the Unification, I believe this is within Second Life&#8217;s grasp.</p>
<p>The problem of grooming has been brought up countless many times since the idea was first proposed.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from an E-mail:</p>
<p>&#8220;As a small, yet fun test, I created a &#8216;PG and Profanity&#8217; filter for local<br />
chat. The filter would pick up certain words when they were said, such as<br />
profane words, or sexually explicit words. Within just a few days, my<br />
filter had picked up hundreds of violations, and with each, spewed out a<br />
simple &#8216;Don&#8217;t use profanity&#8217; or &#8216;You are in a PG-sim. Don&#8217;t use sexually<br />
explicit themes&#8217;, et cetera.</p>
<p>My point being that the Teen Grid is far from &#8216;dandy&#8217;. In fact, I believe<br />
Teens are at a much higher risk on the Teen Grid then if the teens were<br />
able to venture to the Main Grid.</p>
<p>An adult, a pedophile &#8211; for the sake of arguments, lets make this person a<br />
male. This adult decides he wants to &#8216;attack some teens&#8217;, so he makes a<br />
Teen Grid account. Fact &#8211; Teens are more likely to have open contact with<br />
their peers. The adult would be most quickly accepted as &#8216;part of the<br />
group&#8217; under a Teen alias then had the adult tried to same thing on the<br />
Main Grid if teens were present there. The teens would most likely<br />
instantly report a &#8216;freaky old guy hitting on&#8217; them then &#8216;a possibly cute<br />
boy from So-Cal&#8217;.</p>
<p>While it may seem Teens will be at a higher risk on the Main Grid, it is<br />
in fact the opposite. Teens don&#8217;t have any walls up, they&#8217;re vulnerable on<br />
the Teen Grid; Teens are still at a stage where they may trust their peers<br />
pretty easily.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Alex Harbinger</p>
<p>[http://www.alexharbinger.com for the full Proposal]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

